How to Manage Mass Carrier Rejections in a Volatile Freight Market

The State of Freight in 2025: Capacity is Loose—But Unstable

The 2025 freight market presents a paradox: on the surface, it’s a soft market, but underneath, it's increasingly unpredictable. National tender rejection rates remain modest - hovering between 6% and 8% according to recent SONAR OTRI data - but the volatility within regional markets tells a different story. Southeastern U.S. hubs like Atlanta and Savannah have seen outbound rejection rates spike above 11% during peak produce season, while capacity in the Midwest fluctuates weekly due to manufacturing surges and infrastructure projects.

At the same time, carriers are exiting the market at a concerning pace. According to data from FTR and CarrierLists, over 1,500 trucking authorities have been revoked per week throughout early 2025. This churn is driven by a mix of prolonged low rates, rising insurance premiums, and tightening credit conditions.

As spot rates inch upward (C.H. Robinson forecasts a 4% increase in dry van cost-per-mile by year-end) shippers find themselves increasingly exposed to last-minute coverage gaps and pricing instability. One of the most acute manifestations of this volatility? Mass carrier rejections.

What Are Mass Carrier Rejections? Why Do They Matter?

In most cases, a single carrier rejecting a few tenders is no cause for alarm. But when a carrier rejects hundreds or even thousands of loads at once, the impact is both operationally disruptive and financially damaging. These mass rejections typically occur within short timeframes - sometimes minutes - and can overwhelm your Transportation Management System (TMS), trigger emergency re-tendering, and send spot exposure skyrocketing.

While rare, these events are becoming more frequent in high-volume, contract-heavy operations. They're often driven by:

• Rate dissatisfaction: Carriers reject in bulk when the spot market offers significantly higher rates than contracted loads.
• Capacity reallocations: Carriers shift trucks to other customers or regions due to seasonal surges, internal profitability analysis, or network optimization.
• Systemic errors: EDI/API misconfigurations or misinterpretations can result in unintended mass declines.

These aren’t just technical hiccups, they’re warning signs of deeper issues in carrier relationships, market alignment, or system configuration. And when left unaddressed, they can cost your business dearly in time, money, and customer satisfaction.

Step 1: Detect Mass Rejections Early Using Real-Time Data

The first step in managing mass carrier rejections is rapid detection. Too often, operations teams don't notice an event until planners are flooded with alerts or a wave of failed tenders clogs the system.

To prevent this, you need to:

• Set baseline rejection metrics using historical data. Know what “normal” rejection volumes look like for each carrier, lane, and season.
• Implement anomaly alerts in your TMS or analytics platform. If a carrier suddenly rejects more than 100 loads within 15 minutes, or deviates significantly from their historical baseline, your team should be notified instantly.
• Overlay market intelligence from tools like FreightWaves SONAR, DAT, or FTR to contextualize the spike. Are rates in the region suddenly rising? Are OTRI levels climbing?

When detection happens in real-time, your team can act before the damage spreads.

Step 2: Build Resilient Systems to Absorb the Shock

Mass rejections don’t just cause tender failures, they can bring your TMS and planning workflows to a halt. To ensure operational continuity, shippers should proactively configure their systems to handle these events.

Here’s how:

• Throttle incoming EDI messages to prevent backend overload. Configure your TMS to queue or batch-process large waves of rejection messages.
• Rate-limit carrier interactions during a rejection burst. Too many real-time status updates can degrade system performance.
• Set tender retry thresholds to avoid endlessly re-offering loads to non-responsive or underperforming carriers.

A resilient system doesn’t just alert, it protects your bandwidth and ensures other tenders and loads continue to flow smoothly.

Step 3: Apply Smart Commercial Rules to Prevent Repeat Events

Mass rejections often signal a commercial breakdown, typically around rate competitiveness or volume commitments. Rather than treat each event as isolated, shippers should apply programmatic business rules that prevent recurrence.

Strategies include:

• Auto-applying rate floors: If a lane’s spot market exceeds your contract rate by a defined threshold (e.g., 15%), your TMS can automatically trigger a spot bid event or adjust the tendered rate.
• Tiered carrier pools: Classify carriers by historical performance—on-time delivery, cancellation rates, claims, and responsiveness. Only “Gold” carriers (e.g., scores above 85) should receive first-round tenders during sensitive shipping periods.
• Tender diversification: Instead of routing all volume to a single primary, split loads across a core group of high-performing carriers. This lowers the risk of single-point failure.

These actions shift your posture from reactive to proactive, using historical performance and market data to make smarter decisions at dispatch.

Step 4: Address the Root Cause Within 24 Hours

Every mass rejection event should trigger a structured, time-bound post-mortem. This isn’t about blame, it’s about clarity, learning, and forward progress.

Here’s what that looks like in practice:

• Schedule a call with the carrier within 24 hours of the event. Bring rejection logs, rate benchmarks, and load volumes.
• Ask why the event occurred: Was it market-driven, capacity-related, or a system error? Validate this against external data.
• Agree on an action plan: This might include updated rate corridors, better forecasting from your side, or process improvements on theirs.

For repeat offenders, carriers that trigger two or more mass events per quarter, consider revising their eligibility, re-tiering their access, or adjusting volume commitments.

Building a Long-Term Prevention Strategy

Beyond triage, every transportation team should invest in long-term prevention. This requires coordination between operations, procurement, and IT.

Best practices include:

• Embedding rejection clauses in carrier contracts. For example: “Rejection of 20% or more of awarded tenders in a 24-hour period without notice constitutes a service violation.”
• Training planners to read carrier scorecards at the point of dispatch, not after the fact. Service metrics should be visible and weighted alongside cost during every load assignment.
• Running quarterly freight risk reviews during seasonal spikes (e.g., produce season, retail holidays, construction peaks) to assess exposure and pre-approve rate flexibility.

Transportation isn’t just about lanes and loads, it’s about system design, incentives, and fast feedback loops.

Final Thoughts: Turning Chaos into Competitive Advantage

Mass rejections are more than operational noise, they’re signals. They indicate when your pricing, capacity planning, or partnerships are out of sync with market reality. And when managed well, they become opportunities to build a smarter, more resilient freight operation.

In 2025’s volatile market, the most successful shippers won’t be those with the cheapest contract rates. They’ll be the ones who can absorb volatility without service disruption, pivot with speed, and use dat, not guesswork, to guide every decision.

If you’re not yet monitoring for rejection bursts, tiering your carrier base, and using dynamic business rules in your TMS, now is the time to start. Because when the next surge hits, it won’t be the market that decides who wins, it will be your systems.

Looking to strengthen your transportation resilience? Let’s talk about how a more intelligent TMS can help you detect, prevent, and manage mass rejections before they derail your network.

‍